Total Economic Valuation of Great Lakes Recreational Fisheries: Attribute Non-attendance, Hypothetical Bias and Insensitivity to Scope
John C. Whitehead, Louis Cornicelli and Gregory Howard
Abstract: We use stated preference methods to estimate willingness to pay to avoid reductions
The Aggregate Economic Value of Great Lakes Recreational Fishing Trips
John C. Whitehead, Louis Cornicelli, Lisa Bragg and Rob Southwick
Abstract: We use the contingent valuation method in a survey of Great Lakes anglers to
They doth protest too much, methinks: Reply to “Reply to Whitehead”
John C. Whitehead
No 24-04, Working Papers from Department of Economics, Appalachian State University
Abstract: Desvousges, Mathews and Train (2020) point out a mistake in
From the inbox:
The International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics has published the following new issue. The articles in this issue are freely avaible until 20 February[*]. For other issues or for subscription
From the NORC NOW email:
$394 billion. That’s how much hunters, anglers, and wildlife observers spent on being in the wild in 2022, according to the latest National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated
I wrote a referee comment to the effect of:
Many contingent valuation method researchers use the nonparametrice Turnbull WTP estimates for hypothesis testing. This is inappropriate when the data must be "pooled" to get
Tanga Mohr and John Whitehead [1]Department of Economics Appalachian State University
Introduction
The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) is a cap-and-trade program that covers the electric power sector in more than 10 northeastern states. The cap-and-trade
In which we* use old-timey contingent valuation willingness to pay for a recreation trip questions. After this paper and others (in the past and in the future), I'm thinking that attribute non-attendance mitigates